Différences entre les versions de « VBTutorial3 »

De Workshops
Aller à la navigation Aller à la recherche
 
(11 versions intermédiaires par 5 utilisateurs non affichées)
Ligne 1 : Ligne 1 :
[[VB_workshop_tutorials_program|<< Return to the program]]
+
[[VB_tutorial|<<< VB tutorials main page]]
  
  
Ligne 31 : Ligne 31 :
 
## minimal structures for reactant;
 
## minimal structures for reactant;
 
## minimal structures for product.
 
## minimal structures for product.
 +
# How would you define your different fragment orbitals for this calculation (''$frag'' section) ? You will find the answer for this case is in the [[General_guidelines_for_BOVB_calculations#Recommended_definition_for_the_orbital_blocks|"recommended definition for the orbital blocks" section of the "practical for BOVB calculations" document]]
 
# Perform <math>\pi</math>-D-BOVB calculation for reactant [[General_guidelines_for_BOVB_calculations#High_symmetry_case:|(see "high symmetry cases" here)]]:
 
# Perform <math>\pi</math>-D-BOVB calculation for reactant [[General_guidelines_for_BOVB_calculations#High_symmetry_case:|(see "high symmetry cases" here)]]:
 
## Perform all-structure <math>\pi</math>-D-BOVB calculation as following:
 
## Perform all-structure <math>\pi</math>-D-BOVB calculation as following:
Ligne 47 : Ligne 48 :
 
# Compute the Barrier height of the <math>\textrm{S}_{\textrm{N}}2</math> reaction in both vacuum and solution. See the difference of the barrier heights, and find out the reason.
 
# Compute the Barrier height of the <math>\textrm{S}_{\textrm{N}}2</math> reaction in both vacuum and solution. See the difference of the barrier heights, and find out the reason.
 
# Compare the energies of reactant and product structures at reactant and transition state geometries, in both vacuum and solution. What's the difference of the energies at different points? Why?
 
# Compare the energies of reactant and product structures at reactant and transition state geometries, in both vacuum and solution. What's the difference of the energies at different points? Why?
# Compute the resonance energies at both reactant and transition state points, see the difference of the resonance energies.
+
# Compute the resonance energy at the crossing point of diabatic curves state points in vacuum.
  
 
{| class="collapsible collapsed wikitable"
 
{| class="collapsible collapsed wikitable"
Ligne 143 : Ligne 144 :
 
! scope="col" | VBSCF
 
! scope="col" | VBSCF
 
! scope="col" | BOVB
 
! scope="col" | BOVB
! scope="col" | VBSCF/PCM
 
 
! scope="col" | BOVB/PCM
 
! scope="col" | BOVB/PCM
 
|-  
 
|-  
 
! scope="row"    | All Structures
 
! scope="row"    | All Structures
| -36.98034 ||-37.02508 || -37.06980 || -37.11346  
+
| -36.98034 ||-37.02508 || -37.11346  
 
|-
 
|-
 
! scope="row" | Reactant
 
! scope="row" | Reactant
| -36.95812 || -36.97494 || -37.05258 || -37.06909
+
| -36.95984 || -36.98719 || -37.07951
 
|-
 
|-
 
! scope="row" | Product
 
! scope="row" | Product
| -36.95812 ||-36.97494 ||-37.05258 || -37.06910
+
| -36.95984 ||-36.98718  || -37.07949
 
|-
 
|-
 
! scope="row"      | Resonance Energy
 
! scope="row"      | Resonance Energy
| 13.9 || 31.5 || 10.8 || 27.8
+
| 12.9 || 23.8 || 21.3
 
|}
 
|}
 
</center>
 
</center>
  
  
|}
 
  
|}
 
  
 
{| class="collapsible collapsed wikitable"
 
{| class="collapsible collapsed wikitable"
Ligne 180 : Ligne 178 :
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 +
 
=====Weights of Structures=====
 
=====Weights of Structures=====
 
<center>
 
<center>
Ligne 353 : Ligne 352 :
 
b - Let us express the various energies and matrix elements in terms of the usual <big><math> \beta </math></big> and  <big><math> S </math></big> integrals between the X and H orbitals:
 
b - Let us express the various energies and matrix elements in terms of the usual <big><math> \beta </math></big> and  <big><math> S </math></big> integrals between the X and H orbitals:
  
<big><math> E_{ind} = 2 \beta S </math></big>
+
<big><math> E_{ind} = \beta S </math></big>
  
 
<big><math> S_{12} = 0.5 </math></big>
 
<big><math> S_{12} = 0.5 </math></big>
Ligne 385 : Ligne 384 :
 
## minimal structures for product.
 
## minimal structures for product.
 
# Perform VBSCF and VBCISD calculations for reactant:
 
# Perform VBSCF and VBCISD calculations for reactant:
## Perform a VBSCF calculation with "''orbtyp=hao''" and "''boys''";
+
## Perform a VBSCF calculation (file name: rs_vbscf) with "''orbtyp=hao''" and "''boys''";
## Perform a VBCISD calculation with VBSCF orbital as initial guess.
+
## Perform a VBCISD calculation (file name: rs_vbcisd) with VBSCF orbital as initial guess.
## Perform VBSCF and VBCISD calculations with minimal structures for reactant and product.
+
## Perform VBSCF and VBCISD calculations with minimal structures for reactant (file names: rs_*_rs) and product (file names: rs_*_ps).
# Perform VBSCF and VBCISD calculations for transition state with the same procedure as in step 2.
+
# Perform VBSCF and VBCISD calculations for transition state (file names: ts_*) with the same procedure as in step 2.
  
 
<br>
 
<br>
Ligne 601 : Ligne 600 :
  
 
5- Allyl radical <math>\pi</math> system is isoelectronic to the <math>H_3</math> radical case.   
 
5- Allyl radical <math>\pi</math> system is isoelectronic to the <math>H_3</math> radical case.   
R correspond to one covalent right coupling (radical on the left carbone atom). P to the radical on the right carbone.  
+
R corresponds to the covalent right coupling (radical on the left carbone atom). P to the covalent right coupling.  
* <math> \Psi^{\neq}  </math> corresponds to the mesomery between these 2 bonding schemes.
+
* <math> \Psi^{\neq}  </math> corresponds to the resonance (mesomery) between these 2 bonding schemes.
 
* <math>\Psi^{\star} </math> to the "through space" (a,c) electronic coupling ("long bond", the radical is centered on the middle atom).
 
* <math>\Psi^{\star} </math> to the "through space" (a,c) electronic coupling ("long bond", the radical is centered on the middle atom).
  
... work in progress
+
The geometrical distortion to make the two states degenerated in allyl radical would be a rotation of the two CH2 end groups: by such a rotation, the resonance structures are destabilized (pi bonds break), and the a-c coupling is re-inforced (sigma bond forms).  
 
 
To make the state degenerated in allyl radical ....
 
  
The end product obtained  from the first excited state of allyl radical ... cyclopropyl radical, that would return to a open radical upon deexcitation.
+
The end product obtained  from the first excited state of allyl radical is a cyclopropyl radical (formation of the a-c bond).
  
  

Dernière version du 18 janvier 2013 à 15:56

<<< VB tutorials main page


Valence Bond State correlation diagrams

Exercise 1 : Computation of state correlation Diagrams for a 3 centers / 4 electrons system

In this exercise the <math>\textrm{S}_{\textrm{N}}2</math> reaction Cl<math>{}^{-}</math> + CH<math>{}_3</math>Cl -> ClCH<math>{}_3</math> + Cl<math>{}^{-}</math> will be studied in both vacuum and solution. Valence Bond State Correlation Diagrams (VBSCD) will be constructed at <math>\pi</math>-D-BOVB level. There are two parts in this exercise: basic part and optional part. The basic part is performed with MCP-DZP basis set in which the inner orbitals in Cl and C are described with MCP pseudo potential. The optional part is performed with 6-31+G* basis set, using the general specification for the xmvb input (expert users). Only reactant and transition state will be computed in this exercise, which is sufficient to build the VBSCD diagrams.