Différences entre les versions de « ACIT: Actions »

De Workshops
Aller à la navigation Aller à la recherche
 
(Une version intermédiaire par le même utilisateur non affichée)
Ligne 1 : Ligne 1 :
[[ACIT_:_the_project|<<< Back to the main page]]
+
[[ACIT_:_the_project|<<< Back to main page]]
  
 
'''''What do we want to do in order to meet our goals ?'''''
 
'''''What do we want to do in order to meet our goals ?'''''
  
  
* Regular interactive workshops gathering developers in conceptual models and interpretative methods of all classes
+
* Regular interactive workshops gathering developers of conceptual models and interpretative methods of all classes
  
  
* Regular conferences involving also chemists interested by using conceptual models and interpretative methods  
+
* Regular conferences involving all chemists interested in using conceptual models and interpretative methods  
  
  
Ligne 16 : Ligne 16 :
  
  
* Create and maintain An interactive wiki web-site, including :
+
* Create and maintain An interactive wiki web-site, that will allow people to rapidly enter the field, and update their knowledge. Such a wiki web-site should include:
** On-line tutorials involving introductory and more advance theoretical material, on-line computer exercices.
+
** On-line tutorials involving introductory and more advance theoretical material along with on-line computer exercises.
** Short texts (wiki pages ?) clarifying for each class and sub-class of methods, for all outsiders of these sub-communities :  
+
** Short texts clarifying for each class and sub-class of methods, for all outsiders of these sub-communities :  
 
*** what are the basic underlying concepts,  
 
*** what are the basic underlying concepts,  
 
*** what it can and cannot do,   
 
*** what it can and cannot do,   
** Wiki-like approach that will allow people to rapidly enter the field, and update their knowledge.
+
 
  
  
 
* Prizes and awards  
 
* Prizes and awards  
** What for ? Is it really relevant for a small community ?…
+
** <font color="gray"> What for ? Is it really relevant for a small community ?…</font>
*** well if it helps to achieve at least some of the goals we are after than maybe it is worth it.  
+
<font color="cian"> well if it helps to achieve at least some of the goals we are after than maybe it is worth it. </font>
** Where is  the money coming from? Who needs such an encouragement?
+
** <font color="gray"> Where is  the money coming from? Who needs such an encouragement?</font>
*** regarding the money - well I guess money does not have to be involved. It can be just an honorary award or just a symbolic amount..
+
<font color="cian"> regarding the money - well I guess money does not have to be involved. It can be just an honorary award or just a symbolic amount.. </font>
 +
 
 +
 
  
 
* Favor the developments of fast and easy-to-use programs, interfaced to commonly used packages.   
 
* Favor the developments of fast and easy-to-use programs, interfaced to commonly used packages.   
 +
<font color="cian"> I do not understand what is the motivation of this statement. </font>
  
  
 
* Develop the interactions with “real chemists” who are the people who need these concepts :  
 
* Develop the interactions with “real chemists” who are the people who need these concepts :  
** What can we organise to enhance this interaction?  
+
** What can we organize to enhance this interaction?  
 
** Should we create a data base that can be searched?  
 
** Should we create a data base that can be searched?  
 +
<font color="cian"> I think this was answered by the meetings /websites/etc that was offered before </font>
  
  
* How do we stay to machine learning?  
+
* Try to explore and introduce new directions, e.g., usage of machine learning in the various conceptual/interpretative methods.
** A priori, it gives no insight. But can it not be that it provides a source for which we can develop tools that give insight?
+
 
 +
<font color="grey"> * How do we stay to machine learning?  
 +
** A priori, it gives no insight. But can it not be that it provides a source for which we can develop tools that give insight? </font>
  
  
 
* Tools adapted for large systems.  
 
* Tools adapted for large systems.  
 
** Should we develop tools/concepts for methods that are not quantum, but could be useful to get insight in large and complex systems, such as enzymes, proteins, etc.?
 
** Should we develop tools/concepts for methods that are not quantum, but could be useful to get insight in large and complex systems, such as enzymes, proteins, etc.?
 +
<font color="cian"> yes but it is in a way already done...</font>
  
  
Ligne 49 : Ligne 56 :
 
** Getting people to meet at a workshop costs a lot of money. The "advanced institute" would cost even more...
 
** Getting people to meet at a workshop costs a lot of money. The "advanced institute" would cost even more...
 
** ''Meetings: Should we try to meet over internet, with tools like Skype, Zoom, ..., (cf.  https://winterschool.cc/)? At least, this is cheap, and meetings can be recorded, and followed by those who did not participate.''
 
** ''Meetings: Should we try to meet over internet, with tools like Skype, Zoom, ..., (cf.  https://winterschool.cc/)? At least, this is cheap, and meetings can be recorded, and followed by those who did not participate.''
 +
 +
<font color="cian"> I think it is an option but I do not think it should replace the "real" meetings. </font>

Dernière version du 21 novembre 2018 à 13:53

<<< Back to main page

What do we want to do in order to meet our goals ?


  • Regular interactive workshops gathering developers of conceptual models and interpretative methods of all classes


  • Regular conferences involving all chemists interested in using conceptual models and interpretative methods


  • Regular Tutorial schools on different classes of conceptual models and interpretative methods


  • Create an "advanced institute" where people can come and interact for longer periods.


  • Create and maintain An interactive wiki web-site, that will allow people to rapidly enter the field, and update their knowledge. Such a wiki web-site should include:
    • On-line tutorials involving introductory and more advance theoretical material along with on-line computer exercises.
    • Short texts clarifying for each class and sub-class of methods, for all outsiders of these sub-communities :
      • what are the basic underlying concepts,
      • what it can and cannot do,


  • Prizes and awards
    • What for ? Is it really relevant for a small community ?…

well if it helps to achieve at least some of the goals we are after than maybe it is worth it.

    • Where is the money coming from? Who needs such an encouragement?

regarding the money - well I guess money does not have to be involved. It can be just an honorary award or just a symbolic amount..


  • Favor the developments of fast and easy-to-use programs, interfaced to commonly used packages.

I do not understand what is the motivation of this statement.


  • Develop the interactions with “real chemists” who are the people who need these concepts :
    • What can we organize to enhance this interaction?
    • Should we create a data base that can be searched?

I think this was answered by the meetings /websites/etc that was offered before


  • Try to explore and introduce new directions, e.g., usage of machine learning in the various conceptual/interpretative methods.

* How do we stay to machine learning?

    • A priori, it gives no insight. But can it not be that it provides a source for which we can develop tools that give insight?


  • Tools adapted for large systems.
    • Should we develop tools/concepts for methods that are not quantum, but could be useful to get insight in large and complex systems, such as enzymes, proteins, etc.?

yes but it is in a way already done...


  • How should we fund all this ?
    • Getting people to meet at a workshop costs a lot of money. The "advanced institute" would cost even more...
    • Meetings: Should we try to meet over internet, with tools like Skype, Zoom, ..., (cf. https://winterschool.cc/)? At least, this is cheap, and meetings can be recorded, and followed by those who did not participate.

I think it is an option but I do not think it should replace the "real" meetings.