Différences entre les versions de « RPA abstracts »
| Ligne 242 : | Ligne 242 : | ||
[4] D. Agassi, Nucl. Phys. A 116 (1968) 49. | [4] D. Agassi, Nucl. Phys. A 116 (1968) 49. | ||
| − | == ''' | + | == '''Extensions of the RPA: Are they correct?''' == |
| − | ''' | + | '''Osvaldo Civitarese''' |
| − | '' | + | ''Departamento de Fisica, Universidad de La Plata, Argentina'' |
| − | + | Several extensions of the RPA have been proposed, to account for | |
| − | + | the failure of the approximation in the presence of phase | |
| − | + | transitions. The problem is particularly severe for the case of | |
| − | + | proton-neutron correlations, where the attractive two-particle | |
| − | + | channels of the interaction may induce the collapse of the RPA. In | |
| − | + | this talk we review the situation and show that most of the | |
| − | + | proposed extensions are unjustified on theoretical grounds. | |
== '''Title of the talk''' == | == '''Title of the talk''' == | ||
Version du 7 janvier 2010 à 17:47
Please add below your talk abstract. You are encouraged to upload (see toolbox on the left side bar) or to link to any useful material.
The Selfconsistent Quasiparticle RPA and Its Description of Thermal Pairing Properties in Nuclei
Nguyen Dinh Dang
1 - Heavy-Ion Nuclear Physics Laboratory, Nishina Center for Accelerator-Based Science RIKEN 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako city, 351-0198 Saitama, Japan
2 - Institute for Nuclear Science and Techniques, Vietnam Atomic Energy Commission Hanoi - Vietnam
The Selfconsistent Quasiparticle RPA (SCQRPA) is constructed [1] to study the effects of fluctuations on pairing properties in finite systems. The theory is applied to nuclei at finite temperature [2] and angular momentum [3]. Particle number projection is taken into account within the Lipkin-Nogami method. Several issues such as the smoothing of superfluid-normal phase transition, thermally assisted pairing in hot rotating nuclei, extraction of the nuclear pairing gap using an improved odd-even mass difference are discussed [4]. Finally, a novel approach of embedding the projected SCQRPA eigenvalues in the canonical ensemble (CE) is proposed (the CE-SCQRPA) [5]. Applied to a doubly-folded equidistant multilevel pairing model, the proposed CE-SCQRPA produces results in good agreement with those obtained by using the exact eigenvalues, whenever the latter are possible, and is workable also for large values of particle number (N>14), where the diagonalisation of the pairing Hamiltonian is impracticable.
References
[1] N. Quang Hung and N. Dinh Dang, Phys. Rev. C 76 (2007) 054302 and 77 (2008) 029905(E).
[2] N. Dinh Dang and N. Quang Hung, Phys. Rev. C 77 (2008) 064315.
[3] N. Quang Hung and N. Dinh Dang, Phys. Rev. C 78 (2008) 064315.
[4] N. Quang Hung and N. Dinh Dang, Phys. Rev. C 79 (2009) 054328.
[5] N. Quang Hung and N. Dinh Dang, in preparation
The two faces of RPA: density functional theory and many-body perturbation theory
Xavier Gonze
Unité Physico-Chimie et de Physique des Matériaux (PCPM), Université catholique de Louvain, Place Croix du Sud 1, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgique
The RPA expression for total energy might be derived either within density functional theory, (in the adiabatic-connection fluctuation-dissipation framework, by setting the exchange-correlation kernel to zero), or from many-body perturbation theory (from the Nozières functional in the GW approximation for the self-energy, when the green's function corresponds to an energy-independent one-body Hamiltonian). I will review results in which these two faces of RPA appear. First, the RPA exchange-correlation potential is obtained from a linear-response Sham-Schlüter equation [1,2]. Second, the RPA band gap (I-A expression) corresponds to non-renormalized G_0 W_0 [3]. I will also show that density functional theory within the RPA provides a correct description of bond dissociation for the hydrogen dimer in a spin-restricted Kohn-Sham formalism, i.e., without artificial symmetry breaking, with important static (left-right) correlation [4]. Although exact at infinite separation and accurate near the equilibrium bond length [5], the RPA dissociation curve displays unphysical repulsion at larger but finite bond lengths [4,6].
References
[1] Y.-M. Niquet, M. Fuchs, X. Gonze, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 9504 (2003)
[2] Y.-M. Niquet, M. Fuchs, X. Gonze, Phys. Rev. A 68, 032507 (2003)
[3] Y.-M. Niquet, X. Gonze, Phys. Rev. B 70, 245115 (2004)
[4] M. Fuchs, Y.-M. Niquet, X. Gonze, K. Burke, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 094116 (2005)
[5] M. Fuchs, X. Gonze, Phys. Rev. B 65, 235109 (2002)
[6] M. Fuchs, K. Burke, Y.-M. Niquet, X. Gonze, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 189701 (2003)
How approximate is the random phase approximation? Comparing RPA against full configuration-interaction calculations
Calvin W. Johnson
Department of Physics, San Diego State University, USA
I compare the random phase approximation against numerically exact configuration-interaction calculations in the nuclear shell model and find good, not perfect, results. This is of particular importance when one is using a phenomenological interaction. I also discuss the so-called "collapse" of RPA in "phase changes" and illustrate the difference between first- and second-order phase changes and how collapse occurs in only one.
References
[1] I. Stetcu and C. W. Johnson, Phys. Rev. C 66, 034301 (2002); Phys. Rev. C 67, 043315 (2003); Phys. Rev. C 69, 024311 (2004). [2]C. W. Johnson and I. Stetcu, Phys. Rev. C 80, 024320 (2009).
RPA and coupled cluster theory & some recent results including range separation
Gustavo E. Scuseria
Department of Chemistry and Department of Physics & Astronomy, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA
The recent realization that the ground-state correlation energy of the random phase approximation (RPA) is intimately connected to an approximate coupled cluster doubles (CCD) model [1], opens interesting avenues for mixing RPA with density functional theory (DFT) [2]. I will describe some of the recent work done in our research group on RPA, including applications to van der waals and noncovalent interactions [3], the importance of the reference state [4], a simple second-order approximation [5], and a second-order exchange (SOSX) correction that restores antisymmetry [6].
References
[1] The ground state correlation energy of the Random Phase Approximation from a ring Coupled Cluster Doubles approach, G. E. Scuseria, T. M. Henderson, and D. C. Sorensen, J. Chem. Phys. 129, 231101 (2008).
[2] Long-range-corrected hybrids including random phase approximation correlation, B. G. Janesko, T. M. Henderson, and G. E. Scuseria, J. Chem. Phys. 130, 081105 (2009).
[3] Long-range corrected hybrid functionals including random phase approximation correlation: Application to noncovalent interactions, B. G. Janesko, T. M. Henderson, and G. E. Scuseria, J. Chem. Phys. 131, 034110 (2009).
[4] The role of the reference state in long-range random phase approximation correlation, B. G. Janesko and G. E. Scuseria, J. Chem. Phys. 131, 154106 (2009).
[5] Coulomb-only second-order perturbation theory in long-range-corrected hybrid density functionals, B. G. Janesko and G. E. Scuseria, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11, 9677 (2009).
[6] Hybrid functionals including random phase approximation correlation and second-order screened exchange, J. Paier, B. G. Janesko, T. M. Henderson, G. E. Scuseria, A. Gruneis, and G. Kresse, J. Chem. Phys. submitted.
Promising first results with an RPA correlation functional based on the frequency-dependent Kohn-Sham exchange kernel
Andreas Görling and Andreas Hesselmann
Lehrstuhl für Theoretische Chemie, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
The random phase approximation (RPA) correlation energy is expressed in terms of the exact local Kohn-Sham (KS) exchange potential and corresponding adiabatic and nonadiabatic exchange kernels for density-functional reference determinants. The approach naturally extends the RPA method in which, conventionally, only Coulomb interactions are included. By comparison with the coupled cluster singles doubles with perturbative triples method it is shown for a set of small molecules that the new RPA method based on the KS exchange kernel yields correlation energies more accurate than RPA on the basis of Hartree-Fock exchange.
References
[1] A. Hesselmann and A. Görling, Mol. Phys., in press.
Large-scale Second RPA calculations
Panagiota Papakonstantinou
Institute of Nuclear Physics, T.U. Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
Extended RPA theories, which go beyond first-order RPA, are often used to describe the strength, decay width and fine structure of collective excitations in nuclei and other many-body systems. Second RPA (SRPA) is a simple and straightforward extension of RPA to second order, based on the Hartree-Fock ground state. In the present work, large-scale (i.e., without arbitrary truncations of the 1p1h+2p2h model space), “self-consistent” (i.e., with a single two-body interaction as the sole input) SRPA calculations are performed and analyzed. Divergence problems are avoided thanks to the use of finite-range interactions. It is presented how the large-scale eigenvalue problems that SRPA entails can be treated, and how the method operates in producing self-energy corrections and fragmentation. Besides the usual inconsistency problems (broken symmetries), stability problems are encountered, which are traced back to missing ground-state correlations. Nevertheless, nuclear giant resonances appear rather stable with respect to correlations. The results are discussed in the context of extended RPA theories, as well as of suitable effective interactions.
How accurate is RI-RPA? Quality of resolution-of-the-identity methods for RPA correlation energies
Henk Eshuis, Julian Yarkony and Filipp Furche
Department of Chemistry, University of California, 1102 Natural Sciences II, Irvine, CA 92697-2025, USA
Recently the random phase approximation (RPA) has seen renewed interest as a way of computing molecular correlation energies in a Kohn-Sham context. The RPA has the attractive feature of describing long-range interactions correctly [1], thus addressing a long-standing problem in density functional theory. Additionally it has been shown recently that the RPA can be cast in a computationally attractive form, making it a promising method for larger molecules (30-100 atoms) [2]. The off-diagonal parts of the orbital rotation Hessian matrices are rank-deficient and can be therefore be represented accurately in a relatively small auxiliary basis set using resolution-of-the-identity (RI) methods, in the same vein as in RI-MP2 [3, 4]. In this work we study the accuracy of RI-RPA correlation energies for several testcases. I will show that the error due to RI is small and comparable to the error of RI-MP2. I will discuss why RI-RPA can make RPA calculations more efficient.
References
[1] Dobson, J. In Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory, Vol. 706; Springer: Berlin Heidelberg, 2006; page 443.
[2] Furche, F. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 129, 114105.
[3] Feyereisen, M.; Fitzgerald, G.; Komornicki, A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1993, 208, 359 – 363.
[4] Weigend, F.; Haeser, M. Theor. Chim. Acta 1997, 97, 331–340.
Linear response strength functions with iterative Arnoldi diagonalization
Jacek Dobaczewski
Department of Physics, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. box 35, FIN-40014, Finland; Institute of Theoretical Physics, Warsaw University, ul. Hoża 69, PL-00681, Warsaw, Poland
We report on an implementation of a new method to calculate RPA strength functions with iterative non-hermitian Arnoldi diagonalization method, which does not explicitly calculate and store the RPA matrix. We discuss the treatment of spurious modes, numerical stability, and how the method scales as the used model space is enlarged. We perform the particle-hole RPA benchmark calculations for double magic nucleus 132Sn and compare the resulting electromagnetic strength functions against those obtained within the standard RPA
References
[1] J. Toivanen, B.G. Carlsson, J. Dobaczewski, K. Mizuyama, R.R. Rodriguez-Guzman, P. Toivanen, P. Vesely; arXiv:0912.3234
Collective Excitations within the Second RPA
Danilo Gambacurta,
Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia dell'Università di Catania, INFN Sez. Catania
Second Random Phase Approximation [1] (SRPA) is a natural extension of RPA obtained by introducing more general excitation operators where two particle-two hole configurations, in addition to the one particle-one hole ones, are considered. Some applications of SRPA with the phenomenologic Skyrme interaction in nuclei will be shown. Particular attention will be devoted to the issue of the residual interaction to be used in the matrix elements beyond the standard RPA ones. Both in RPA and SRPA use is made of the Quasi Boson Approximation [2] that amounts to use the Hartree-Fock state as reference state. Some problematic aspects due to this approximation will be finally analyzed and an extended SRPA approach, in which ground state correlations are taken into account, will be presented and applied in the context of metallic clusters[3]. Ground state correlations are taken into account either in a perturbative way or by means of a more consistent procedure that allows to obtain better results, especially in the case of the Dipole Plasmon.
References
[1] C. Yannouleas, Phys. Rev. C35 1159 (1987).
[2] P. Ring and P. Schuck, The Nuclear Many-Body Problem (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980).
[3] D. Gambacurta and F. Catara, Phys. Rev. B 79, 085403 (2009) and submitted to Phys. Rev. B
An overview of RPA from the Nuclear Physics perspective
Peter Schuck
Université Joseph Fourier & CNRS, Grenoble, France
In the introductory talk from the nuclear side, I will shortly review how RPA is applied in its standard way to nuclear structure using density dependent effective forces. I also will repeat some properties of RPA which makes it an appreciated approximation. I will continue to outline extensions of RPA in use in nuclear physics, like self consistent inclusion of ground state correlations, renormalised RPA, symmetry aspects, etc. Useful literature is listed below.
References
[1] J. Dukelsky, P. Schuck, Towards a variational theory for RPA like correlations and fluctuations, Nucl. Phys. A512 (1990) 466
[2] See also Nucl. Phys. A628 (1998) 17
Extended RPA from time dependent density matrix theory
Peter Schuck
Université Joseph Fourier & CNRS, Grenoble, France
In this short second talk I will replace my collaborator Mitsuru Tohyama and talk about an extension of RPA from the formalism of the Time Dependent Density Matrix (TDDM) approach including higher correlation functions. In this context I also will touch on the problem under which conditions the Goldstone theorem remains fulfilled in higher RPA's and on the strict fulfillement of the Pauli principle.
References
[1] M. Tohyama, P. Schuck, Extended RPA with ground state correlations, Eur. Phys. J. A121 (2004) 217.
[2] See also Phys. Rev. C70 (2004) 057307.
RPA selfconsistency and the killing condition
Jorge Dukelsky
Instituto de Estructura de la Materia. CSIC. Serrano 123. 28006 Madrid. Spain.
The Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick (LM) model [1] is a schematic two-level model based on the SU(2) algebra of particle-hole operators. It has been extensively used in nuclear physics as a benchmark model to test many-body approximations. We have used it to test the Self Consistent RPA (SCRPA) [2] by explicitly finding the RPA vacuum that satisfies the killing condition within the particle-hole collective subspace. On a different context, it has been shown that number Projected BCS (PBCS) also satisfies the killing condition [3]. The PBCS state requires the extension of the SU(2) LM to the O(5) Agassi model [4] that incorporates the pair algebra. In this talk I will review our derivation of the SCRPA within the LM model. By comparing both RPA vacuums I will pose the problem of whether PBCS is a unique RPA vacuum, and whether it contains enough particle-hole correlations to describe appropriately systems of interest.
References
[1] H. J. Lipkin, N. Meshkov and A. J. Glick, Nucl. Phys. 62 (1965) 188.
[2] J. Dukelsky and P. Schuck, Nucl. Phys. A 512 (1990) 466.
[3] Y. Ohrn and J. Linderberg, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 15 (1979) 1109.
[4] D. Agassi, Nucl. Phys. A 116 (1968) 49.
Extensions of the RPA: Are they correct?
Osvaldo Civitarese
Departamento de Fisica, Universidad de La Plata, Argentina
Several extensions of the RPA have been proposed, to account for the failure of the approximation in the presence of phase transitions. The problem is particularly severe for the case of proton-neutron correlations, where the attractive two-particle channels of the interaction may induce the collapse of the RPA. In this talk we review the situation and show that most of the proposed extensions are unjustified on theoretical grounds.
Title of the talk
Author
Address
Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract
References
[1]
[2]
Title of the talk
Author
Address
Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract
References
[1]
[2]
Title of the talk
Author
Address
Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract
References
[1]
[2]
Title of the talk
Author
Address
Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract
References
[1]
[2]
Title of the talk
Author
Address
Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract
References
[1]
[2]
Title of the talk
Author
Address
Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract
References
[1]
[2]
Title of the talk
Author
Address
Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract
References
[1]
[2]
Title of the talk
Author
Address
Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract
References
[1]
[2]
Title of the talk
Author
Address
Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract
References
[1]
[2]
Title of the talk
Author
Address
Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract
References
[1]
[2]== Title of the talk ==
Author
Address
Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract
References
[1]
[2]== Title of the talk ==
Author
Address
Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract
References
[1]
[2]== Title of the talk ==
Author
Address
Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract
References
[1]
[2]== Title of the talk ==
Author
Address
Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract
References
[1]
[2]
Title of the talk
Author
Address
Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract
References
[1]
[2]
Title of the talk
Author
Address
Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract
References
[1]
[2]
Title of the talk
Author
Address
Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract
References
[1]
[2]
Title of the talk
Author
Address
Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract
References
[1]
[2]