Abstracts of the TCTC 2014

De Workshops
Aller à la navigation Aller à la recherche

<<< TCTC 2014 main page

Slides available after the workshop

SPEAKERS : please add below, in your own section, your title talk and abstract :

  • first : log in;
  • click on your name in the "Contents" box below, this will lead you to your own section;
  • your section starts with your name as the title line, click on [edit] (far right).
  • >>> How to insert a picture in your abstract


The order of abstracts follow the program of the workshop.


This is an example

Contributor's name

Affiliation

Title

Summary


[1] Popelier, P. L. A.; Brémond, É. A. G. Int.J.Quant.Chem. 2009, 109, 2542.

↑ top of this page

Frontiers in computation

Robert Harrison

Stony Brook University

Title

Summary


↑ top of this page

Roland Lindh

Uppsala University

Title

Summary


↑ top of this page

Peter Taylor

University of Melbourne

Title

Summary


↑ top of this page

Kazuo Kitaura

Kobe University'

Title

Summary

↑ top of this page

Takahito Nakajima

AICS, RIKEN

Title

Summary

↑ top of this page

High accuracy methods /Relativistic corrections

Debashis Mukherjee

Affiliation

Title

Summary


↑ top of this page


Seiichiro Ten-no

Affiliation

Title

Summary


↑ top of this page

Tron Saue

Affiliation

Title

Summary


↑ top of this page


Toru Shiozaki

Affiliation

Title

Summary


↑ top of this page

Density functional theory

Guanhua Chan

Affiliation

Title

Summary

↑ top of this page

John Perdew

Affiliation

Title

Summary


↑ top of this page

Adrienn Ruzsinszky

Affiliation

Title

Summary

↑ top of this page

Xin Xu

Affiliation

Title

Summary


↑ top of this page

Weitao Yang

Duke University

Title

Summary


↑ top of this page

Theoretical spectroscopy / Magnetism

Jeppe Olsen

Affiliation

Title

Summary

↑ top of this page

Daniel Crawford

Affiliation

Title

Summary

↑ top of this page

Trygve Helgaker

Affiliation

Title

Summary

↑ top of this page

Dynamics

↑ top of this page

Material science/ Catalysis

Michel A. Van Hove

Institute of Computational and Theoretical Studies & Department of Physics, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong SAR, China

Rotor molecules as machines

Molecular machines are gaining increasing interest, especially from a biological perspective. They promise to create and control mechanical motion at length scales down to the nanometer. Some molecular machines cause reciprocal motion, as in muscles and switches, while others cause rotational motion, as in flagellae: we focus here on rotor molecules.

Nature developed a variety of molecular machines to create and control motion. These natural machines tend to be complex and robust, due to the need to operate reliably for long times in variable biological environments.

In the last few decades, scientists have synthesized a wide range of new, relatively simpler molecular machines and learned to control and observe some of their important motions, mostly in solution. Increasingly, molecular motors have also been investigated at solid surfaces, allowing the use of surface science techniques for studying monolayers of well-oriented molecules. Nanoscience techniques have added further possibilities.

We shall discuss basic issues of the operation of molecular motors, including energy conversion steps, continuous energy supply, the role of thermal energy, intentional start and stop of motion, and unidirectionality of motion. Without intentional control of these aspects, motors create random motion and are largely useless.


This work was supported by grants from the Hong Kong Baptist University Strategic Development Fund, the Hong Kong RGC, the NBRPC and the NSFC, and by HKBU’s High Performance Cluster Computing Centre, which receives funding from the Hong Kong RGC, UGC and HKBU.

↑ top of this page

RuiQin Zhang

CiteU HongKong

Title

Summary

↑ top of this page

Alexis Markovits

Université Pierre et Marie Curie

Title

Summary

↑ top of this page


Monica Calatayud

Univesité Pierre et Marie Curie

Title

Summary

↑ top of this page

Javier Fdez. Sanz

Universidad de Sevilla

Mechanism of the Water-Gas Shift Reaction: Insights from First Principles Calculations

The traditional approach to the optimization of metal/oxide catalysts has focused on the properties of the metal and the selection of the proper oxide for its dispersion. The importance of metal–oxide interfaces has long been recognized, but the molecular determination of their properties and role is only now emerging. In this talk we focus on the water gas shift reaction, WGSR, a chemical process that allows for obtaining clean molecular hydrogen: CO+H2O → CO2+H2. Bulk like phases or extended surfaces of coinage metals show low catalytic activity that improves when supported on a metal-oxide. Several reaction mechanisms have been proposed. In the redox mechanism, CO reacts with oxygen derived from the dissociation of H2O. In the associative process, the formation of a carboxyl intermediate must precede the production of H2 and CO2. The mechanism involves several steps that can take place at different sites of the catalyst: the metal, the support or the interface. Besides the dispersion effect, the role of the support is to increase the interaction with water and facilitate its dissociation. DF calculations show that supported CeOX nanoparticles are highly efficient in water splitting. Furthermore The M/CeOx /TiO2 (110) surfaces display outstanding activity for the WGS, in the sequence: Pt > Cu > Au. Such a high catalytic activity reflects the unique properties of the mixed-metal oxide at the nanometer level. STM and DF calculations show that Ce deposition on TiO2 (110) at low coverage gives rise to Ce2O3 dimers specifically aligned, indicating that the substrate imposes on the ceria NPs unusual coordination modes enhancing their chemical reactivity.

↑ top of this page

Chemical concepts

Paul Ayers

Using molecular properties to define similarity measures and predict chemical properties


↑ top of this page

Jerzy Cioslowski

Some aspects of Bader’s theory


↑ top of this page

Robert Ponec

"New theoretical methods for the analysis of chemical bonding


↑ top of this page

Patrick Bultinck

Degenerate states: a challenge to common reactivity descriptors


↑ top of this page

Angel M Pendas

Learning (and teaching) chemical bonding from the statistics of electron populations in spatial domains


↑ top of this page

Paul Geerlings

Conceptual DFT, Theoretical Models of Chemical Bonding


↑ top of this page

Eduard Matito

Aromaticity


↑ top of this page

Computational biochemistry / Solvation

↑ top of this page

Reducing complexity

Garnet Chan

Princeton University

Title

Summary


↑ top of this page

Thomas Miller

Caltech

Title

Summary


↑ top of this page

Gustavo Scuseria

Rice University

Title

Summary


↑ top of this page